David Codrea notes that the NSSF is gushing about the new ATF director after Kash Patel was let go from those duties. Forgive me if I say that the NSSF endorsement means absolutely nothing whatsoever to me. They are not in existence to defend either your rights or the 2A.
David knows nothing about him. Neither do I. He has no record at all. This article adds nothing to the discussion.
Time will tell, but I won’t gush over anyone until I see the results. Mr. Driscoll needs to be in front of the house and senate answering questions and trying to persuade them to remove SBRs and suppressors from the NFA. Until I see that, he’s just another talking head doing the bidding of the beltway.
It really does boggle the imagination how the senate and house can be so stolid, unresponsive, stupid, and lazy. They should have removed suppressors from the NFA long ago.
As for that matter, where is OSHA in all of this? Suppressors are about hearing protection. Given the popularity of hunting and the shooting sports, as well as the former military members who have come home with damaged hearing, you’d think if they cared anything about their profession or the people they’re supposed to serve and protect, they would have already been screaming to congress. As for that matter, the ATF should have already been in front of congress pleading to remove suppressors from the NFA.
Only if they cared …
Two amicus briefs came in today on Sanchez v. Bonta, our case challenging California's total ban on suppressors. The first is from National Association for Gun Rights, and the second is from a group of amici including Silencer Shop, Palmetto State Armory, and others. We… pic.twitter.com/kFU44oYqHt
I guess it’s complicated, but according to Mike, it would be a good thing for suppressors to remain under consideration as firearms because then it warrants 2A protection.
I still want to see suppressors off the NFA. For hearing protection. For me. For the children.
GOA & GOF have been GAGGED from printing the news (uncovered in a FOIA) for 18 months.
Despite a recent ruling by the D.C. Circuit prohibiting such gag orders, Biden holdovers in @TheJusticeDept are asking the court to extend this First Amendment violation. pic.twitter.com/sp2FrKNmQo
BLUF. The ATF is illegally spying on gun owners and keeping a gun registry – but of course, you already knew that. GOA has the goods on them. In order to prevent folks from knowing, the FedGov shopped around for a corrupt judge (and of course found one) who gagged GOA from releasing the information.
Guess who is responsible for this? Our buddy, Stephen.
But that isn’t what I want you to do. I want you transferred to the border to crack down on immigration and crime, and/or hunt gangs down elsewhere and rid our nation of the gangs. I want you to do something where you don’t know if you’re going to come home safely at the end of your shift. Failing those two options, I just want you to hunt for a new job.
Review of Executive Actions:
The Attorney General is tasked with examining all orders, regulations, guidance, plans, international agreements, and other actions taken by federal agencies from January 2021 through January 2025. The review will assess whether these actions infringed on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens under the guise of promoting safety.
Focus on Firearms Regulations:
The order specifically directs the Attorney General to review:
Rules promulgated by the Department of Justice, including those by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
Policies related to the “enhanced regulatory enforcement” of firearms and Federal firearms licensees.
Reports issued by the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention.
Classifications of firearms and ammunition by federal agencies.
The processing of applications to make, manufacture, transfer, or export firearms.
Litigation Positions:
The Attorney General is also instructed to evaluate the positions taken by the United States in ongoing and potential litigation that could affect Americans’ ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Development of a Plan of Action:
Within 30 days, the Attorney General must present a proposed plan of action to the President, through the Domestic Policy Advisor, to address any identified infringements on Second Amendment rights. The plan will then be finalized and implemented in coordination with the Domestic Policy Advisor.
Well, okay, I’d like to see where Pam Bondi takes this before I start cheering.
I want to see Trump press the SHUSH act to deregulate suppressors from the NFA and GCA. I won’t be happy until suppressors aren’t an NFA item.
But then, that’s what they do. It’s magic! Just retitle the individual and there you go – now you have a diversity officer who has a more formal title.
You might be confused as to why agencies would fight so hard to keep DEI officers in place.
It’s totally understandable if you haven’t accepted the fact that DEI officers are actually communist political commissars. https://t.co/BpXxA6PUoG
A court vacating the final rule means nothing to the tyrants and controllers. They’re at it again.
Then again, if they are keeping a searchable database of gun owners in violation of federal law — and I believe they are — why wouldn’t they continue to violate the law including judicial orders? No one has stopped them yet. No one has fired them yet. No one has defunded them yet.
There have been absolutely no consequences to their illegalities.
He does just as good of a job with part 3 as he did with parts 1 and 2.
I do have a bone to pick with his analysis. As for the fires set by the British during the war of independence, they did actually do some of that, as did the Tories in S.C. It may not have looked exactly like the one in Patriot, but it did in fact happen where patriots were burned out of their homes.
1 week, 1 day ago
UPDATE
