This is a loathsome exchange. The FBI isn’t ashamed of what they’re doing. We’ve come to expect that sort of thing from them. They have no shame. But the worst thing about it is that the local Sheriff’s Department participated in the charade.
On Saturday, trying to do the right thing led to Republican Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas being put in handcuffs and briefly detained.
The incident happened at the White Deer Rodeo in the town of White Deer about 40 miles from Amarillo, according to the Texas Tribune.
A statement from Jackson’s office said he was attending the rodeo when he was “summoned by someone in the crowd to assist a 15-year-old girl who was having a medical emergency nearby.”
The statement that Jackson, who was a White House doctor for former President Barack Obama, was informed by a relative that the girl needed help in addition to the assistance being provided because “no uniformed EMS providers on the scene at the time.”
“While assessing the patient in a very loud and chaotic environment, confusion developed with law enforcement on the scene and Dr. Jackson was briefly detained and was actually prevented from further assisting the patient,” the statement continued.
“He was immediately released as soon as law enforcement realized that he, as a medical professional, was tending to the young girl’s medical emergency.”
The statement noted said Jackson was “in the stands during the entire rodeo, in full view of the assembled crowd, and was not drinking.”
It sounds like a boilerplate statement from a chief cop concerning a screwup, yes? Wait. It gets much worse.
In a Facebook post in which she referred to Jackson as “ER DR” (which he is professionally), Linda Dianne Shouse gave her summation of the incident.
“I have never been more disappointed in our Rescue Team!!! I got called to render aide to my 15 year old cousin that was unresponsive at the White Deer Rodeo tonight!! She is not from here and was seen at the ER last night as she was told for dehydration and anemia!! I assessed her and she was NOT dehydrated! She was responsive to my voice but not aware of her surroundings. Respirations in the 40s. As I assessed her I noticed she looked as tho it was hypoglycemic episode,” she wrote.
“My cousin who is a BSN in a trauma hospital, myself and an ER DR were working on her. Had her responsive to her whereabouts! ER Dr agreed with me that she was seizing due to possible hypoglycemia. Sheriff’s department put a blood pressure monitor on her below her waist. I rose it to heart level and as she is awake and respirations are slowing down I placed a small piece of gum in a ball UNDER her tongue to give her some sugar. (Better than nothing).”
“Deputys screamed at me and not listening to any thing US medical Professionals had to say, they punched me in my chest and forced me back with a palm to my face as well causing me to fall backwards!! ER Dr was thrown to the grown and ARRESTED!!! I am beside myself!! Prayers for Bailey!!!!!” she concluded.
They’re all blessed to be alive. It’s a wonder the cops didn’t discharge firearms at everyone around them.
You’re never in more danger than when the cops are around, and no situation is so bad that it cannot be made worse by the presence of the police.
Watch the entire video. Here are my initial thoughts.
“It was an honest mistake.” No, it was honestly a dumbass mistake. A different state – literally, the officer entered the wrong state into his database.
You’d think that brandishing a firearm at someone and the reckless endangerment that entails would necessitate some personnel error reduction training. For example, they should be using STAR (Stop, Think, Act, Review), self-checking, independent verification, repeat backs, phenetic alphabet, and a whole host of very simple tools to prevent these sorts of stupid errors. From wrong tag numbers to wrong-home SWAT raids, the error rate among cops has to be higher than even in the medical or pharmaceutical professions. As I’ve pointed out before, they could take a page from the books of commercial nuclear power generators and the airline industry. Imagine if we held cops to the same zero error-rate as FFLs?
Second, that cop who was shouting orders is much too dramatic for me. He needs to take his finger out of the trigger well and calm down. It’s not okay to muzzle flag people at the range, but for some reason cops think it’s okay for them to do it to innocent people.
Third, the policy is stupid. It would had been much more effective if they had simply gone up to the window and knocked on it and asked some questions, perhaps revisited their initial work to come up with the wrong state tag.
Finally, having the people walk backwards on a freeway is about the dumbest thing they could demand. The individuals they’ve stopped have absolutely no way of knowing that they’re correct that the freeway has been shut down. After all, they’ve been stopped for no reason at all by an idiot who entered the wrong state into his database. That doesn’t exactly inspire confidence. My bet, however, is that a DA would have refused to charge them if someone had been run over because of “qualified immunity,” which as we’ve seen before is an unconstitutional abomination borne out of DAs and the judicial bench protecting their own.
This is just stupidity in action. Watch as these cops make enemies of people, abandoning any hope of having people talk about “supporting the blue.” It’s happening all over America as police departments hire the lowest IQ people they can find, and cops abandon the constitution and continue to listen to their dumb police academy trainers.
Note that the First Circuit has held that taking photos and video in public is a right that is sufficiently “clearly established” that those who violated it can’t claim qualified immunity.
If they don’t want you to film them, they have something to hide.
For cops to claim they shouldn’t be filmed would be like me, a professional engineer, saying that I have a right to perform calculations and designs and no one has a right to review them, nor should I be held accountable for them.
That sort of immature thinking is reserved for little children who get caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
The issues of the case don’t interest me that much, although I agree that violence can only be used when there is a threat of serious injury. For example, see Tennesse v. Garner, where the SCOTUS concluded that a LEO cannot discharge his weapon at someone fleeing.
Anyway, the more interesting thing to me is the issue of qualified immunity. As I’ve said so many times before, qualified immunity is an obscene witch’s brew concocted by the courts with no basis in constitutional law for the sole purpose of protecting the agents and enforcers of the state.
I’m glad John is teaching a young man to defend civil rights. I’m sure he’ll turn into a good lawyer. Liberty University is producing some very good graduates in all areas of specialty.
I said he wasn’t a real man and needed to go learn to train, care for and work with farm and ranch animals. Better still, as a beginner he needs to “pick” (or clean out) stalls for a few months, carrying horse shit out of their way so it doesn’t ruin their hooves.
So is there a contrasting example of how real American men behave around good dogs?
They’ve been caught secretly putting cameras in women’s locker rooms, on camera invading men’s homes and working through their belongings for things, and on and on. The list is long and available on this site, but also available at the YouTube channel The Civil Rights Lawer.
He gives us this update. Can you imagine going on record under oath writing the sequence of events and other supposedly factual information about a home invasion your department perpetrated when you were not there? Can you imagine being a prosecutor who brought a case against a man and bringing witnesses, none of whom perpetrated the police attack on the man in court that day as a witness?
This may very well be the most corrupt police department in the nation, and that’s an ignominious list indeed.
We’ve said it hundreds of times, but this guy is a good example of how (a) you never talk to the police, and (b) you never give them permission to do anything. That’s what this crook was seeking.
The LEOs are good examples of highwaymen, simple crooks who steal from others, except in this case, under the color of law. The prosecutor who did this is equally a crook.
Apparently, it’s commonplace across America to teach police officers that conducting an investigation means they can do whatever they want.
Note in this first case that, in order, (a) she stopped the wrong individual, (b) apologized to him, (c) told him pointedly that he had broken no laws, (d) demanded his identification, (e) then told him failure to provide identification was obstructing a police investigation.
Note the logical problem they create for themselves (and the individual they’re stopped). A person has not violated any law, the officer demands ID, the individual is under no legal obligation to provide ID if there isn’t articulable suspicion of a crime, and then the whopper at the end, failure to provide ID is obstructing a police investigation.
Under that schema, there is never a time when an individual can refuse to provide ID because the cop can claim that they are “conducting an investigation” (a fabricated crime that even if it did occur, occurred after the erroneous stop because there was no articulable suspicion of a crime). This is a “Morton’s Fork.” The individual hasn’t committed a crime and thus no ID can be demanded, but an ID can be demanded because the demand itself cannot be refused or else the individual has obstructed an investigation.
This is the game idiots play, and it twists the ruling of the SCOTUS in “Terry Stops.”
Here is the lawsuit. The girl is a wrong and gullible but perhaps teachable, at least until she has her conscience seared by her co-workers. The supervising officer is just plain stupid, reactionary, volatile, bossy, and clearly not a thinking man. He’s perfect to be a cop according to modern hiring practices for LEOs.
The next case is like unto it. The cops demand to come within the property lines because, guess what, “they are conducting an investigation.” There’s that phrase again.
Here’s a quick note to cops everywhere. Conducting an investigation doesn’t give you the right to violate civil rights, regardless of what the wicked instructors have taught you in the police academy. You should know better.
These guys are just as bad as the ones above and obviously couldn’t care less about the constitution or their oaths. They are also obviously bullies.