There’s a difference between a pointed soft point and a hollow point. But don’t leave it to soy boy to understand that.
Actually, I’m sure he did. He was just trying to scare the women on the jury. Maybe some “men” too. Never mind that he had FMJ loaded into his mags.
This trial is such a clown show that the judge had to LITERALLY CORRECT the prosecutor on his understanding of ammunition types pic.twitter.com/cELfUElgrR
Somehow, in spite of the circus show this turned out to be, in spite of juror #54 potentially going rogue, justice has been served and Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all counts.
The charges should never have been filed to begin with.
Fill in with comments as you see fit.
UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds observes, “This is a big deal not only because of the merits of the individual case, which manifestly shouldn’t have been brought, but because all the effort around it by the left was aimed at establishing the principle that their thugs could riot in the streets, but that normals don’t dare resist. This is a huge setback for that effort.”
UPDATE #2: Now it’s time to hold the prosecution accountable for their malfeasance. They knew who one of Kyle’s attackers was (the so-called jump-kick man), and didn’t tell the defense. Then there is the little issue of the compressed video. Send them up before the BAR, and then put them in jail.
Pleasantly surprised. Good that the National Guard is standing by. They will be needed.
Well, not unless they’re under arming orders. I’ve brought this up many, many times before, especially when the NG was deployed to the border. They’re deployed without weapons, or without ammunition, and with no ROE/RUF. Someone has to sign arming orders for them even to be able to effect self defense.
Arming orders. Remember those two words. Find the orders, send them to me and I’ll post them. If they aren’t under arming orders, they’re just window dressing.
Uh oh. This is weak tea, and very disappointing. It might be time to find a new general to lead the guard.
If they are to become militia, they should keep their Class 3 weaponry, embrace the new life, work to ensure liberty and freedom, and refuse to be “federally mobilized.”
Here is some of the high resolution video they didn’t turn over to the defense. I don’t know if there’s more than this. It clearly shows that Kyle’s life was in danger. He would have been entirely within his rights to have shot earlier than he did.
Here’s the HD drone footage of Kyle Rittenhouse, with visual guides to show what happened during the Joseph Rosenbaum shooting. pic.twitter.com/aSCUbmrfNg
— Ian Miles Cheong @ stillgray.substack.com (@stillgray) November 17, 2021
I watched the proceedings today for about 30 minutes of the stupidest stuff I’ve ever seen. The prosecution explained that they tried to airdrop the video to the defense, but since her phone was an Android rather than an iPhone, it must have compressed the data. The clerk for the defense tried to explain that she had nothing to do with airdropping anything, but she received a video in an email (an email!) and that’s what she submitted into evidence. It consumes about a third of the memory that the uncompressed video does.
She tried to explain file size, and help calling it millibyte rather than Megabyte, and then talked about metadata in terms only of file date and time stamp. The prosecution responded, she responded, the judge was confused by it all and said that there will be a recompense over this but not now.
I was flabbergasted. I was just floored. The entire gaggle of them are either ignorant or pretending. What on earth is so hard about this? Even for the technically challenged? A man’s life is at stake.
You don’t treat evidence that way. You ensure a chain of custody, from person to person, with a signature from everyone who touched it, witnessed by a Notary. If it’s electronic evidence, it must be put on a drive with nothing else, date and time stamp published on the drive, and a checksum generated on the file and put on different media so that the user can verify authenticity of the files. If every letter and number of the checksum doesn’t agree in the right order, the evidence is tainted and must be rejected without further consideration.
Just to pile on (because it’s so easy), you can add these to your list of reasons to despise men like this.
They claim that Kyle lost his right of self defense by bringing a firearm. So the actual thing to be used as a means of self defense obviates in perpetuity the exercise of the action for which the implement was carried to begin with.
What. The. Actual. Fuck
Binger: “You lose the right to self-defense when you’re the one who brought the gun.” pic.twitter.com/2pu7lehnBx
Next, they will claim (and have), that Kyle shouldn’t have been there. Here is a reddit/Firearms thread where that is discussed. They’re right.
Same argument as “she was asking for it”
Yep. “You shouldn’t have been at that bar if you didn’t want to get raped”, “you shouldntve (sic) been out after dark if you didn’t want to be raped”.
“She shouldn’t have gone out dressed like that” is directly comparable
Yes, this kind of thinking can only lead to, ‘why did you live in that neighborhood, it’s clearly a bad part of town, just look at these crime rates’ and ‘why are you wearing that, you’re just asking for it’.
Researchers at the University of California were awarded a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation developing technology that infuses experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccines into spinach, lettuce and other edible plants.
The researchers are tasked with demonstrating the genetically modified plants can produce enough mRNA to replace Covid jabs and infuse the plants with the right dosage required to eat to replace vaccines.
[ … ]
Genetically modifying edible plants with experimental vaccines for public consumption is the culmination of a dream, the associate professor explained.
Allow me to translate. “God didn’t do a good enough job when he gave us edible plants. We can do better, and thus we’ve become God.”
First, at Legal Insurrection, the forensic expert supports the defense contention that Kyle’s actions were in self defense. Because they were.
Second, Zero Hedge has a piece up discussing the “grave constitutional violation” involved in the prosecution’s assertion that Kyle’s remaining silent says something about his guilt. In other words, Kyle invoked the Fifth Amendment, and the prosecution wants to make something of it. The jury heard it all. The name of the prosecuting attorney is Thomas Binger. He’s a scumbag.
A witness in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse testified Tuesday that prosecutors pushed him to change his statement to the police.
Amateur photographer Nathan DeBruin took the stand on Tuesday as one of four defense witnesses called that day. During his testimony, DeBruin recounted an earlier, uncomfortable meeting with prosecutors in which DeBruin said they pushed him to change a statement he gave to police regarding another man, Joshua Ziminski, whom prosecutors have charged with arson.
During the defense examination of the witness, defense attorney Mark Richards asked DeBruin to describe the meeting he had had with Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger and Assistant District Attorney James Kraus.
“I was called down to the district attorney’s office. I met with Mr. Binger and [Kraus] … I was called into a room, sat at a table, handed my police statement, got to read over my police statement, and then I was asked if I would like to add anything to the police statement, and I said I would not,” DeBruin began.
“Mr. Binger pulled out a cell phone and showed me a video and also a photo – which was actually one photo that I brought today – and asked me if I knew who a gentleman was in that photo, and I said I did not. … He said, ‘This is Joshua Ziminski.’ Mr. Binger also has a case with him, and I am subpoenaed for that case also,” he continued. “He says, ‘Well, that’s who that is.’ He put the phone down. He picked the phone back up and says, ‘Who is this?’ And I confusingly said, like, Joshua Ziminski, and he said, ‘Would you like to add that to your statement?’ and I just felt I didn’t want to change my statement.”
DeBruin said that after that meeting he retained counsel. Richards closed his examination after the exchange.
Under cross-examination by Kraus, DeBruin testified that the prosecution asked him to “change” his statement, suggesting that prosecutors wanted DeBruin to give the police false information regarding his knowledge about Ziminski.
Finally, here is an exchange between the judge and the prosecuting attorney (sent by Len Savage). The prosecuting attorney (his name is Thomas Binger) is a disgusting piece of garbage, a true dirtbag. The judge gives the attorney a spanking the likes of which I’ve never seen before. In forty one years in my career, I’ve never been dressed down like that.
With that said, it’s now time for the judge to throw the case out of court and imprison the attorney for suborning perjury and contempt of court, right after he reports him to the BAR to have his license revoked.
A room full of court jesters. If the judge has any integrity, he’ll call counsel to his chambers and end the trial now. The prosecuting attorney should be submitted to the BAR to have his license and practicing privileges revoked.
Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent of all charges against him. This is nothing but a political show.
So, they did, but not without some weasel words to be able to deny they ever made the mandate in the first place. This isn’t a very good look for Hornady, but at least they backed down.
For what it’s worth, as of this writing, I still haven’t gotten a response to my note to Steve Hornady.
3 years, 2 months ago
