Dean Weingarten has a good find at Ammoland.
Judge Eduardo Ramos, the U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, has issued an Opinion & Order that a ban on stun guns is constitutional. A New York State law prohibits the private possession of stun guns and tasers; a New York City law prohibits the possession and selling of stun guns. Judge Ramos has ruled these laws do not infringe on rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Let's briefly…… [read more]
I have nothing scientific to convey, just an anecdotal reference point. My local Academy Sports, which almost always has fairly inexpensive 5.56mm and .223 for sale, has no 5.56mm at all. They have very little .223, and what they do have is off-brand.
I’d be interested in your experience. It appears as if there is a rush to buy this caliber and that can be seen at the local level.
Nationally, if you do Ammoseek 5.56 you’ll see a lot of 5.56mm in the price range from 50 – 60 cents per round.
The whole thing was an abortion, promulgated by Donald Trump, and a violation of both the second amendment and the NFA. But I remain skeptical that they will overturn it because scary, scary, scary, ooooo, spooky …
LEGAL ALERT: The Supreme Court has granted the cert petitions in a lawsuit challenging the federal bump stock ban and a First Amendment lawsuit involving the NRA's speech. pic.twitter.com/lURyAGDFqL
I know John and have talked to him face to face, as well as exchanged email with him. I was at a conference (or training session) he was doing in my neck of the woods, and after the presentation a lady walked up and asked him, “Really, how serious is this threat and how close are they – aren’t they ‘over there’ somewhere?”
I responded for John by saying, “There’s a training camp right down the road from you in Rock Hill, S.C.” John nodded. Question answered.
Now, I suspect that this isn’t really about understanding the threat, but rather, caring about it and your oath to the constitution, your family, your tribe, and your country. The Sheriff and his lawyers aren’t dumb. Just wicked.
I initially read a Reddit/Firearms post on whether it’s important who spends the money on a firearm versus whose name is on the 4473. Here is the thread.
I hope this isn’t a stupid question, I have payed for a gun as a gift for someone else, so can they fill out the 4473 as it is/going to be theirs?
ModestMarksman answers.
Yes you can. Anyone saying no doesn’t know what they are talking about.
Source : I have my FFL and SOT
The 4473 asks if you are the actual buyer OR transferee. If it’s a gift then they are the actual transferee.
When I read that I said out loud to myself, “That’s the right answer.”
In order more fully to explain this, he makes an updated discussion thread where he explains more. This is that discussion thread.
FFLs don’t need to give one whit where the money comes from. As long as they are transferring the firearm to the transferee on the Form 4473, it’s legal.
Now, just to remind everyone, all gun control laws are unconstitutional. All of them, with no exceptions.
This time by an ignorant boob, Gretchen Carlson (hey, wasn’t she basically the founder of the “me too” movement?). Anyway, aren’t they always ignorant?
This is her complaint.
Ordinary people didn’t have AR-15s before 2004. They’re not some time-honored American tradition, they’re a recent mistake that we could fix and save thousands of lives in the process. https://t.co/IlJ4FuadBP
