I had earlier point out that the progressives weren't giving up without a fight. Their hard-fought victory over the military establishment and the consequent loss of it, even if partial, cuts deeply. They have so weakened the edifice that it is crumbling. The department cannot meet recruitment goals, needs warfighters for the national defense and cannot find them, wastes increasingly precious dollars on failed programs, and celebrates transgenders and LGBTQ. This crumbling of the edifice meets [read more]
So you’re the same fellow who believed that the NSA surveillance program of Americans was a good thing.
“I assured her that I firmly believed that what N.S.A. was doing was effective, appropriate, and lawful. I also reminded her that the program’s success depended on it remaining secret, that it was appropriately classified, and that any public discussion of it would have to await a later day.”
And I see that you defended all of this in your remarks to The National Press Club. So I see you in the same category as the Petraeus, McChrystal and their ilk. In fact, you were coupled up with those controllers months ago demanding more gun control, so this is old hat to you. I’m as unimpressed with you now as I was back then.
You’re just another traitor to your oath, another collectivist who wants to disarm the American people. You’re also a liar, just like Petraeus and McChrystal. You don’t really believe “those guns” have no purpose, or else you would be demanding the disarming of the military and the police.
As for your “service” in the air force, I don’t give a damn about that. As for your claim that more Americans are dying in the states than in Afghanistan, that’s because we’ve effectively ceased military operations in Afghanistan, and fatherless, inner city criminals are still being made in America by entitlement programs that destroy the family.
So you can just sod off. I think it’s just dandy that you’re in league with Giffords and her band of mother hens. That says something about both of you.